With the recent news of credit card breaches with Home
Depot and Target and the latest iCloud fiasco it is safe to say that there are good
reasons why consumers are worried to share their information online. In the
article written by Alfred Kobsa it goes in depth about privacy enhanced
personalization. As consumers most of us enjoy personalized content, it helps
us to narrow down web content to find something that is relevant to our likes
and needs. But how far do vendors go to
get our information and what do they do with it, is what makes many consumers
nervous to share their information online.
Kobsa writes that what most users say they are most uneasy
about is whether or not their information and purchase records will truly be
kept confidential. Other privacy concerns that users had were that their online
searches would be recorded and used for unknown purposes and that their
inadequate skills would also be recorded. All of these are rational fears; although
most information is gathered for research and marketing purposes, consumers
fear what they do not know.
Internet users can be broken down into 3 major groups
the Privacy Fundamentalist who generally are very concerned, The Privacy
Unconcerned who generally only express mild concern and the Privacy Pragmatists
who are somewhat concerned. This article also concludes from surveys that
people are generally most apprehensive about the things that they are ashamed
of or hold secretive getting out. As we are all aware though many sites do
indeed use or web history to personalize to our taste. Facebook is primarily
one site that does this, if you pay attention many times what you search for in
say Google, will pop up on your timeline. Is this too intrusive? I believe it
is simply apart of personalization. Should Internet sites be required to tell
consumers how their information is being used? 94% of people think they should
because without this knowledge they do not feel comfortable sharing their data
because they do not trust the site. Trust is an important factor for
disclosure, along with positive past experience, design and operation of a
website, privacy statement and reputation of the web site operator.
So is this invasion of privacy worth personalization. Some could argue both ways sure I do enjoy
amazons recommendation but what other information are they sharing of mine.
This practice has been going on for years, cards that you get from grocery
stores such as the MVP card has your address in the system so that every time
you scan your card they can keep track of purchases. Is this worth it?
"So is this invasion of privacy worth personalization." - I don't think it's so much of an invasion of privacy, it's just that people aren't aware what information is being taken. I'm guilty too when I scroll past privacy agreements and click "agree" when installing software or phone updates. The delivery of privacy practices from organization may be what needs change.
ReplyDelete